ESD logo

 

The Latest ESD News

News Archives

Calendar of Current Events

Event Archives

 

 
National Labor-Management Conference

Tom Kochan, Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld Give Keynote Address at National Labor-Management Conference

June 4, 2004

FMCS ANNOUNCES RESULTS OF THIRD CUSTOMER SURVEY

CHICAGO, IL -- Labor-management relations across the country have become increasingly polarized with a greater need for mediation and conflict resolution services to reduce a heightened level of tension, according to results of a survey conducted for the U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS).

Results of the federal agency's third customer survey were presented here on June 4, 2004, at the FMCS's National Labor-Management Conference by researchers Thomas Kochan and Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MIT) Engineering Systems Division and Sloan School of Management.

FMCS conducted its first customer survey in 1996 and has commissioned a survey every three years to fulfill the government's requirement under the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). The survey team, which included the University of Massachusetts and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, used information from the FMCS case database and surveyed 1,168 matched pairs of representatives from labor and management. Union and management representatives were asked whether or not they used FMCS services, their assessment of the services they received, the issues and challenges faced during negotiations, and the nature of collective bargaining relationships.

The survey found that there is increased polarization in labor-management relations and that the collective bargaining environment has become increasingly adversarial. Less emphasis is placed on labor-management strategic partnerships, such as joint task forces, employee involvement in decision-making, or increased worker involvement in operation decisions to improve the workplace. Labor and management respondents reported increasing degrees of contentiousness. FMCS said a heightened level of labor-management tension means a greater need for agency services to assist in resolving complex workplace problems.

Where FMCS services are utilized, management and labor representatives report a positive view of the agency. Ninety percent of management representatives and 92% of labor representatives have a positive view of FMCS's work in collective bargaining mediation. About 84% of union respondents and 70% of management respondents rated the FMCS mediation excellent or very good, and nearly 100% of union officials and 96% of management officials would use FMCS mediation services again.

Both labor and management representatives using FMCS services had a very high regard for mediators' knowledge and skill. Ninety-two percent of management respondents and 95% of union respondents reported that mediators have a high level of trustworthiness and general expertise. Ninety-five percent of union respondents and 88% of management respondents believe that mediators have a good understanding of the issues at the bargaining table. Ninety- two percent of management officials and 88% of union officials have a high regard for FMCS mediation skills.

The survey also asked respondents about mediators' processes and substantive knowledge that they bring to the bargaining table. Around 75% of management and union representatives believed that mediators make a "big" or "very big" effort to help the parties identify underlying obstacles to reaching agreement. Around 70% of both parties also believe that mediators make a "big" or "very big" effort in helping the parties face reality. Fifty percent of management respondents and 60% of union respondents perceive that mediators make a big or very big effort in proposing substantive suggestions to reaching an agreement.

Respondents in the public and private sectors were asked about the likelihood of a strike, lockout or arbitration without mediation efforts. Fifty percent of private sector union and management respondents reported that a strike, lockout or arbitration was likely if there were no mediation at all. In the public sector, 52% of management respondents and 62% of union respondents reported that a strike, lockout or arbitration was likely without mediation.

FMCS provides arbitration services, grievance mediation and relationship-development training, in addition to collective bargaining mediation. With respect to FMCS arbitration services, 65% percent of management and 88% of union respondents ranked arbitration panelists as excellent, very good or good, and more than 90% of both sides reported receiving panel names in a reasonable period of time. Eighty-eight percent of management and 90% of union respondents rated grievance mediation services as excellent, very good or good. As for the agency's relationship development and training programs, more than 95% of both labor and management ranked FMCS services as excellent, very good or good.

In his remarks at the 12th National Labor-Management Conference, FMCS Director Peter Hurtgen challenged labor-management practitioners to review the results of the survey and consider their roles in the collective bargaining process. With a clear pattern of increased polarization in labor relations, Hurtgen told conferees that labor-management cooperation and collaboration are more valuable than ever. "In tough times, it is easier for both sides to succumb to a "lose-lose" adversarial strategy," the FMCS Director said. "The best strategies in times such as these are not so much winning strategies as those that avoid losing." He told attendees that, with increasing tension, both labor and management must look for ways to work together to achieve high-producing, quality workplaces.

The MIT survey team will continue to run correlative tests with the data and will roll out results of the survey to union and management representatives at various locations throughout the country. Roundtable discussions also will be conducted to secure labor's and management's perspective on the survey results.

The U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, created in 1947, is an independent U.S. government agency whose mission is to preserve and promote labor-management peace and cooperation. Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 10 district offices and more than 70 field offices, the agency provides mediation and conflict resolution services to industry, government agencies and communities.

 

Contact info:

Thomas Anton Kochan
77 Massachusetts Ave.
Building E52-583
Cambridge, MA 02143

Phone: 617.253.6689
Email to: tkochan "at" mit.edu

 

         
MIT SoE MIT Sloan School of Management MIT School of Science SHASS SA+P